Private, who signed a scandal decision, made a call for a boycott by targeting Türkiye’s national brands yesterday evening.
The Turkish Commercial Code by the relevant companies about the statements of CHP leader Özgür Özgür Özgür Özel to boycott some companies and brands. 55 VD provisions in the context of the legal actions that can be taken in the context of the lawyer Tunç, “Political motives for certain enterprises for boycott calls, according to the nature of the statements they contain, the Turkish Commercial Code no.
“TCC art. 55/1-A-1: Others or their property, commercial activities, misleading or unnecessary hurtful explanations to denigrate” unfair competition “said Tunç,” Such statements in digital media such as social media does not change the legal nature of the act. Boycott of their goods “call, aimed at commercial reputation has been evaluated as an act of unfair competition,” he said.
Even if the declarations are true, if it contains immeasurable, disproportionate or commercial damage intent. Tunç stated that the provisions of unfair competition can be applied in accordance with 55, and “freedom of expression” does not give legitimacy to unlawful actions. TTK m. Pursuant to the provision of 62, the people who deliberately perform these acts may be sentenced to imprisonment or judicial fine of up to two years upon complaint. In addition, damaged enterprises have the right to resort to legal remedies for detection, menu and compensation “.
