Imamoglu, who was dismissed from his position as the president of the IMM and was arrested within the scope of the corruption investigation; The expert SB took part as a suspect.
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
In this decision, the investigation of the expert has been started, but the investigation of the court files on the ongoing and decided trial activity may mean any investigation process can not be done by law, otherwise the independence of the trial can not be provided.
It was argued that the expert report and similar evidences were unlawful by the file side and that the judge could make a criminal complaint against the officials who caused any law in the decision to be evaluated by the judge as a result of the submission to the relevant file during the ongoing trial stages.
In the decision, the petition presented by the lawyer of Imamoglu Büyükçekmece 10th Criminal Court of First Instance in the ongoing file prepared by the expert’s report was declared that the law and unreal issues included and complained for this reason.
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
It was emphasized that there was no place to prosecute by the Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of the expert reports that were in the discretion of the courts because of the continuation of the proceedings and that the authority was directly courts. The decision reported that there was no concrete evidence that could be achieved in order to open a public case against the expert and there was no place for prosecution.
On the other hand, the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office prepared an indictment about Ekrem Imamoglu on charges of “attempting to influence the expert or witness” on charges of imprisonment and political prohibition. Within the scope of the indictment, Imamoğlu is expected to appear before the judge on June 12th.
