In the Tarsus district of Mersin, 20 -year -old Özgecan Aslan, a university student killed in the minibus he rode, was killed in Adana Prison of 26 -year -old Ahmet Suphi Altındöken and his father Necmittin Altındöken was also wounded in the case of the defendants.
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
Özgecan Aslan’s murderer Ahmet Suphi Altındöken allegedly killed in prison Gültekin Alan about the aggravated life and 29 years 9 months and 10 days imprisonment of the decision of the decision of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals on the decision to break the decision of the defendants, the decision of the defendants’ decision to be acquitted for the third time.
Gültekin Alan, who was heard as a witness at the decision hearing for the penalty, claimed that they decided together 4 people to commit the murder, “Biri Ferat Y., one Ahmet Tekin B., the other is Adem Ç.. Ahmet Tekin B..
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
Özgecan Aslan’s murder suspect Ahmet Suphi Altındöken and his father Necmittin Altındöken were attacked by the prisoner Gültekin Alan in the ward where they stayed in prison. Ahmet Suphi Altındöken died in the attack and his father was injured. Gültekin Alan in the investigation initiated about the attack, the execution of the execution of the allegedly helping him Hacı Ahmet Ö., Allegedly put the gun in prison Hüsamettin B., his wife Gamze B. and Ahmet Tekin B., Ferat Y. and Serkan A. Adana 5th High Criminal Court.
At the end of the trial, the court sentenced Gültekin Alan to an aggravated life imprisonment for ‘killing a man and killing’. Furthermore, Alan ‘designing to kill man by attempting to kill’ 18 years, ‘insult’ 1 year 4 months, ‘forbidden goods to prison, 6136 opposition to law’ crimes 6 years, ‘Execution protection officers’ freedom of freedoms’ 4 years 5 months and 10 days, including a total of 29 years 9 months and 10 days imprisonment was given. The other defendants were acquitted of lack of evidence.
The Supreme Court broke the decision
Adana Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office and Alan’s ‘I will give a detailed statement’ on the petition of the Supreme Court of Appeals 1st Criminal Chamber of the local court overturned the decision.
In the case of the Court of Court of Appeals on the decision of the Court of Appeals on the decision of the Court of Appeals on the 2nd High Criminal Court, the court prosecutor’s opinion on the merits, Gültekin Alan’s ‘designing and killing’, ‘attempting to kill’, ‘Penal execution institution’ forbidden goods ‘,’ the person to kill the person ‘to kill’ He demanded that he be punished for the crimes of ‘inserting forbidden goods to the execution institution’.
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
After the decision to break the hearing, Özgecan Aslan killed the murderer in prison, allegedly attempted to kill his father Gültekin Alan, the content of the case more than all the defendants, claiming that he knows the best, the defendant Ahmet Tekin B., Ferhat Y. The other defendants denied Alan’s claims and asked for their acquittal by stating that they had no interest in the incident.
The local court made the same decision
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
The court delegation resisted the decision to disrupt the defenses of Gültekin Alan and sentenced the defendant Alan to the aggravated life he had given before, and also sentenced to a total of 29 years 9 months and 10 days in prison. He also acquitted the lack of evidence about the other defendants.
The 1st Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court of Appeals was sent to the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals due to the dispute when the local court did not see the resistance in its former decisions about the defendants on 2 November 2021.
In his assessment of the General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals, the local court decided to approve the conviction of the defendant Gültekin Alan. Other defendants Hüsamettin B., his wife Gamze B. and Ahmet Tekin B. and Ferat Y. ‘qualified intentional killing and attempted to kill qualified intentional killing’ in terms of acquittal decisions, in the determination of whether the aforementioned crimes were fixed and decided to deteriorate on the grounds that the provision was established. Two members of the general assembly of the majority of the members of the general assembly of the defendant Gültekin Alan in terms of the provisions of the conviction of the provisions of the provisions of the provision of the provisions of the decision against the vote against the opinion.
class = “Mediannet-inline-Adv”>
Alan: “We decided to commit the murder with 4 people”
Upon the decision of the Court of Cassation Criminal General Assembly about the other defendants other than Gültekin field, the case file was sent back to the local court. Adana 5th High Criminal Court for the third time in the case of the decision about the Gultekin Alan was heard as a witness.
Alan, “You did not punish those who put the gun in the prison that I will tell those who put the gun in prison. Therefore, I will not make a statement about those who put the gun in prison. You have accused Hüsamettin and his wife about the insertion of this gun. The men have nothing to do with this crime.”
The president of the court, the acquittal decisions in part of the area on the area, “acquittal decisions are broken. We decided to commit this murder together 4 people. One Ferat Y., one Ahmet Tekin B., the other is Adem Ç..
The defendants did not accept Alan’s claims and asked for acquittal. The court did not find this statement of Gültekin Alan, who was sentenced to aggravated life and 29 years 9 months and 10 days of imprisonment. The delegation decided separately, as the defendants had committed the crimes of ‘attempted to kill qualified and killing qualified intentionally’, they decided separately, as they could not achieve precise and convincing evidence. Ferat Y., one of the defendants, was not decided due to the error made in the tensip zapt. Later on the error, the defendant Ferat Y. in the direction of the continuation of the case was decided.
In the reasoned decision of the court, the basic condition of the defendant to be punished for a crime is the basic condition, the crime can be proved to be proved in a absolutely no doubt, “Adana Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office of the defendants Hüsamettin B. and Gamze B. about the” attempt to kill, to kill, to kill, ” Inspecting the attempt ‘, the defendant Hacı Ahmet Özdoğan’ designed to kill, design and kill ‘to be punished for the crimes of a public case against the defendant, other than the defendant, the defendant, the other defendants in the written and verbal defenses. The stable defenses of the defendants, the statements of the complainant execution protection officers, in the report dated 19/12/2016 organized by the experts, between 14.23 and 14.26 hours of the ward on 11/04/2016, under the clothes of Gültekin Alan and how to provide the pistol in front of the ward. When Tekin Baykal made hand gestures to calm down by raising his left hand towards Gültekin Alan, but when there was no sound recording on the cameras, when he was reported and the scope of the whole file was taken together; Since the accurate and convincing evidence far from all kinds of suspicion enough to punish the defendants, the defendant benefiting from the suspicion of the defendants Hüsamettin and Gamze B., Ahmet Tekin B., Hacı Ahmet Ö.
